In Re Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because the automatic stay provision is applicable to state court's post-petition order in a CT Page 8812 foreclosure action, the order is null and void

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Musso v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp. (In Re Royal Business School, Inc.)
  E.D. New York· 1993-08-04· cited 19×
• Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Mehta
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1995-12-19· cited 8×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,103 Ostano Commerzanstalt and Dr. Herbert Jovy v. Telewide Systems, Inc., and Bernard L. Schubert
  Second Circuit· 1986-04-29· cited 94×
• Hughes v. Bemer
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-08· cited 59×
• Linda Pope v. Manville Forest Products Corporation
  Fifth Circuit· 1985-12-12· cited 53×
• 48th Street Steakhouse, Inc. v. Rockefeller Group, Inc. (In re 48th Street Steakhouse, Inc.)
  Second Circuit· 1987-12-15· cited 32×
• Maloney v. American National Bank (In re Terkeltaub)
  D. Connecticut· 1990-08-03· cited 5×
• Regnery-Gateway, Inc. v. Key Book Service, Inc. (In re Key Book Service, Inc.)
  D. Connecticut· 1990-05-16· cited 1×