In Re Carol F. Klopfenstein and John L. Brent, Jr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, “for something to be considered a ‘printed publication[,]’” “the key inquiry is whether or not a reference has been made ‘publicly accessible’”
• considering whether the reference \goes direct to those whose interests make them likely to observe and remember whatever it may contain that is new and useful\
• \The expertise of the intended audience can help determine how easily those who viewed it could retain the displayed material.\
• address- ing dispute over public accessibility of a printed slide presentation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).