Skip to main content
· 4/11/2000

In Re Carnegie International Corp. Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 107 F. Supp. 2d 676
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6137
  • 2000 WL 767482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that request is not particularized where subpoena sought 21 categories of documents, testimony on 32 different subjects and every document relating to at least 77 separate individuals and entities
  • holding that the stay also precludes defendants, from acquiring documents from a third party
  • “Until the opportunity to test the sufficiency of the complaint has passed, the congressional intent is clear — no discovery should commence.”
  • “More well reasoned decisions have held the automatic stay provision of the Act is triggered by the mere indication by defense of its intention to file a motion to dismiss” (citing cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gauvey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.