In re Carlton E.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we must consider all evidence for and against challenged finding and set it aside only if it is so contrary to overwhelming weight of evidence as to be clearly wrong and unjust
• explaining that the exception could only apply if the parent had waited more than one year before petitioning for the return of the child
• finding briefing waiver where there appellate brief did not contain argument, authority, or references to the record
• “[A] brief that does not contain citations to appropriate authorities and to the record for a given issue waives that issue.”
• “Failure to cite to appropriate legal authority or to provide substantive analysis of the legal issues presented results in waiver of a complaint on appeal.”
• “[A] brief that does not contain citations to appropriate authorities and to the record for a given issue waives that issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).