In Re Carl L. Pedrazzini and Camille Pedrazzini, Bankrupt. Jack C. Runnion v. Carl L. Pedrazzini and Camille Pedrazzini

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The existence of scienter is a 20 question of fact, not to be reversed on appeal unless clearly 21 erroneous.
• The 10 existence of scienter is a question of fact, not to be reversed 11 on appeal unless clearly erroneous.
• The 10 existence of scienter is a question of fact, not to be reversed 11 on appeal unless clearly erroneous.
• Knowledge 28 of the falsity or deceptiveness of a statement and intent to -19- 1 deceive are questions of fact.
• Knowledge 28 of the falsity or deceptiveness of a statement and intent to -19- 1 deceive are questions of fact.
• agreeing with “the Fifth Circuit’s criticism” of Romero

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).