In re Care & Treatment of Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that offender failed to preserve his challenge to the foundation for admission of nursing notes where he initially objected, the State responded by providing additional foundation evidence, and then the offender neglected to object again before the evidence was admitted
• finding that sexual offender failed to preserve his challenge to the foundation for admission of nursing notes where he initially objected, the State responded by providing additional foundation evidence, and then the offender neglected to object again before the evidence was admitted
• To decide whether a challenged instruction is clearly erroneous, the court \must assess whether it is firmly convinced the jury would have reached a different verdict had the instruction error not occurred.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).