Skip to main content
· 12/31/2007

In Re Cardinal Health Inc. Securities Litigations

Citations

  • 528 F. Supp. 2d 752
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95127
  • 2007 WL 4613804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that requested fee amount with a lodestar multiplier of 7.89 was not unreasonable “[g]iven the outstanding settlement in this case and the noticeable skill of counsel.”
  • finding that requested fee amount with a lodestar multiplier of 7.89 was not unreasonable “[g]iven the outstanding settlement in this case and the noticeable skill of counsel.”
  • explaining that “[m]ost courts agree that the typical lodestar multiplier in a large post-PSLRA securities class actions ranges from 1.3 to 4.5
  • stating that the Sixth Circuit has “explicitly approved the percentage approach in common fund cases.”
  • finding that class counsel faced “less risk than in other securities cases because it piggybacked on the success of a prior SEC investigation” and because the defendant had conceded some liability
  • finding that class counsel faced lower risk because public events precipitated the litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marbley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.