Skip to main content

In Re Caranchini

Citations

  • 956 S.W.2d 910
  • 1997 WL 731524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that disbarment proceedings do not violate double jeopardy
  • holding that disbarment proceedings do not violate double jeopardy
  • attorney was disbarred for “falsely representing to the court that she lacked knowledge of a potential party’s change of residence and . ... that she could connect the testimony of work environment witnesses to her client.” Id. at 918.
  • attorney was disbarred for \falsely representing to the court that she lacked knowledge of a potential party's change of residence and . . . that she could connect the testimony of work environment witnesses to her client.\ Id. at 918.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Limbaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Caranchini

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.