Skip to main content
· 10/18/2010

In Re Capps

Citations

  • 438 B.R. 668
  • 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 3684
  • 2010 WL 4117443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that an Idaho debtor could not exempt real property located in Colorado under Idaho law
  • “the determination of whether a statute has extraterritorial effect is a matter of state law interpretation”
  • “[A]s long as the debtor may take advantage of some 2 state exemption, the hanging paragraph does not allow the debtor to use the § 522(d) 3 exemptions.”
  • “. . . to allow a debtor to utilize the federal exemptions provided by § 522(d), the debtor must be ineligible for all state exemptions in all potential states”
  • “Therefore, even if a debtor cannot take advantage of any state’s homestead exemption, as long as the debtor may take advantage of some state exemptions, the hanging paragraph does not allow the debtor to use the § 522(d) exemptions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jim D. Pappas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.