N.D. Ohio· 2/22/2001
In Re Campbell
Citations
- 259 B.R. 615
- 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 229
- 2001 WL 245533
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the phrase does not include every service rendered to debtor
- sanction for failure to disclose postpetition fee agreement and receipt of compensation postpetition was cancellation of fee agreement, disgorgement of all fees received and bar from collecting further fees
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pat E. Morgenstern-Clarren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re WhaleyM.D. Florida· 2002-08-06· cited 25×
- In Re MayeauxE.D. Texas· 2001-10-10· cited 24×
- In Re WaldoE.D. Tennessee· 2009-10-27· cited 21×
- Schroeder v. Rouse (In Re Redding)Eighth Circuit· 2001-07-25· cited 18×
- In Re HackneyM.D. Florida· 2006-06-15· cited 17×
- In Re Busetta-SilviaTenth Circuit· 2004-09-08· cited 13×
- In re JonesE.D. Wisconsin· 2014-01-31· cited 12×
- In Re BartmannN.D. Oklahoma· 2004-07-14· cited 10×
- In re StewartW.D. Oklahoma· 2018-04-27· cited 10×
- In re HirschW.D. Michigan· 2016-05-13· cited 8×
- In Re LawsonE.D. Tennessee· 2010-08-31· cited 6×
- In Re BeckerM.D. Florida· 2012-04-03· cited 4×
- In re NewtonE.D. Texas· 2003-04-25· cited 1×
- In Re PiccininiE.D. Michigan· 2011-04-22
- David E. Schroeder v. Norman E. RouseEighth Circuit· 2001-06-21
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.