In Re Cameron T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he court must give meaning to each word, phrase, clause, and sentence of the provision.”
• Proposition 102 was “clearly intended to speed the pace and augment the effectiveness of the juvenile justice system in Arizona, and to respond more stringently to juvenile crime when appropriate.”
• “The overall intent of [the initiative] was to make possible faster, more effective, and in some cases more stringent responses to juvenile crime.”
• Proposition 102 was “clearly intended to speed the pace and augment the effectiveness of the juvenile justice system in Arizona, and to respond more stringently to juvenile crime when appropriate.”
• “[A]s was true before Prop[osition] 102 was adopted, no statute or constitutional provision precludes adult prosecution of a juvenile who is no longer under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court.”
• court rule fixed procedural method for asserting substantive rights in juvenile proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).