In Re Cameron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing the debtors to claim an exemption in their home despite not physically occupying it at the time of filing because fire damage made it uninhabitable
• debtors not physically occupying their home because of fire damage permitted to claim homestead exemption
• absence from residence at time of filing is not always sufficient, in itself, to extinguish right to use homestead exemption; intent to return may preserve exemption
• “The intent of the Debtors and their subsequent conduct are also factors to be taken into consideration.”
• absence from residence at time of filing is not always sufficient, in itself, to extinguish right to use homestead exemption; intent to return may preserve exemption
• home made temporarily uninhabitable by fire damage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Wengerd
  Sixth Circuit· 2011-06-15· cited 28×
• In Re Dvoroznak
  E.D. New York· 1984-03-13· cited 23×
• In Re Lusiak
  N.D. Ohio· 2000-03-09· cited 20×
• Matter of Wiesner
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1984-06-26· cited 19×
• In Re Cope
  N.D. Ohio· 1987-11-19· cited 15×
• In Re Tomko
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-06-28· cited 14×
• In Re Bartoszewski
  N.D. New York· 1984-02-02· cited 12×
• In Re Warren
  N.D. New York· 1984-04-06· cited 8×
• Matter of Pagan
  N.D. Ohio· 1986-05-23· cited 5×
• Brayman v. Petersen (In Re Brayman)
  D. Massachusetts· 1985-07-16· cited 3×
• United States v. Lutgert
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1969-06-13· cited 2×
• In re: James Wengerd v.
  Sixth Circuit· 2011-06-15
• Pitrat v. Unkefer (In re Unkefer)
  D. Arizona· 1984-10-23
• In re Shinners
  N.D. Ohio· 1986-03-25