In Re Camellia Food Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• postpetition premiums could not be offset against prepetition claims under pri- or policy years, including retroactive premium adjustments on prior year policies
• insurance premiums were postpetition obligations where related coverage was postpetition; coverage is “conduct” giving rise to claim for premium payment
• “the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has implicitly endorsed the integrated transaction test.”
• “Given Virginia law indicates a renewal of an insurance contract is a new contract and the Worker’s Compensation policy itself indicates every policy will only last approximately one year, thus, the 2001 premiums do not arise from the same contract as any of the previous premiums.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).