In Re CALEB L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that typographical ’errors noted by the appellant in the trial court’s detailed judgment did not affect the overall clarity of the judgment or this Court’s analysis
• finding that typographical errors noted in the trial court’s detailed judgment did not affect the overall clarity of the judgment or this Court’s analysis
• noting that the trial court’s “divorce decree specifically made permanent the restraining order prohibiting [the f]ather from contacting [the m]other or [the child]”
• finding that typographical errors noted by the appellant in the trial court’s detailed judgment did not affect the overall clarity of the judgment or this Court’s analysis
• holding the statute permits the trial court to combine both phases into one hearing
• holding the statute permits the trial court to combine both phases into one hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).