In re Cai

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Holding a function-by-function analysis is not necessary if the ALJ properly inquires into and considers a claimant’s physical and mental limitations.
• noting that the RFC determination is the “exclusive responsibility” of the ALJ, and that “the ALJ need include in the RFC only those limitations which he finds credible.”
• finding that substantial evidence supported the ALJ's finding that a plaintiff was not disabled given her conservative treatment, lack of hospitalization, and ability to perform household chores and activities of daily living
• finding that substantial evidence supported the ALJ’s conclusion that a claimant was not disabled in light of her conservative treatment, lack of hospitalization, and ability to perform household chores and daily life activities
• finding that, even though the ALJ failed to perform a function-by-function analysis, the ALJ accounted for plaintiff’s testimony in an RFC analysis regarding the plaintiff’s ability to sit and stand in her prior work
• finding that, even though the ALJ failed to perform a function-by-function analysis, the ALJ accounted for plaintiff’s testimony in an RFC analysis regarding the plaintiff’s ability to sit and stand in her prior work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).