Skip to main content
N.D. Georgia· 10/31/2014

In re Cabe & Cato, Inc.

Citations

  • 524 B.R. 870
  • 2014 WL 7779663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]f the interests of another client may impair the lawyer’s independent professional judgment or in anyway foreclose alternatives that would otherwise be available to the client, the lawyer is prohibited from undertaking simultaneous representation.”
  • the movant’s failure to immediately seek disqualification was because “she ‘was trying to get a handle on all of the facts’ … and that she wanted to be on solid ground before filing such a motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mullins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.