In re C. Moench & Sons Co.
Citations
- 130 F. 685
- 66 C.C.A. 37
- 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4202
Syllabus
<p>1. Bankruptcy — Jurisdiction op Court to Make Adjudication — Possession op Property by Receivers.</p> <p>The fact that the property of a corporation is in the possession of receivers appointed by a state court does not affect the jurisdiction of a court of bankruptcy to adjudicate such corporation a bankrupt.</p> <p>2. Same — Manufacturing Corporation — Effect op Receivership bepore Piling op Petition.</p> <p>The appointment of receivers for a manufacturing company, and its ceasing to do business in consequence, before the filing of a petition in bankruptcy against it, do not deprive the court of jurisdiction to make the adjudication against it as a corporation engaged principally in manufacturing pursuits.</p> <p>3. Same — Defense of Solvency.</p> <p>In involuntary proceedings in bankruptcy against a manufacturing corporation under Bankr. Act 1898, § 3a, cl. 5, 30 Stat. 546 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3422], based on its admission in writing of its inability to pay its debts, and its willingness to be adjudged a bankrupt on that ground, a creditor cannot prove its solvency as a defense.</p> <p>4 Same — Act of Bankruptcy — Power op Directors to Commit.</p> <p>Where, under the laws of the state, a corporation has power to make a general assignment of its property for the benefit of creditors, in the absence of a statute or by-law regulating the subject such assignment may be made by the board of directors, and, having such power, they may also make the admission in writing of the inability of the corporation to pay its debts, and of its willingness to be adjudged a bankrupt on that ground, which constitutes an act of bankruptcy under Bankr. Act 1898, § 3a, cl. 3, 30 Stat. 546 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, § 3422], and such admission may be made the basis of a petition against it by its bona fide creditors.</p> <p>5. Same.</p> <p>The appointment of temporary receivers for a corporation does not deprive the directors of the power to make a written admission of its inability
Judges: Lacombe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re Wm. S. Butler & Co.First Circuit· 1913-09-10· cited 32×
- Struthers Furnace Co. v. GrantSixth Circuit· 1929-02-15· cited 28×
- In re American & British Mfg. Corp.D. Connecticut· 1924-07-14· cited 28×
- Woolsey v. Security Trust Co.Fifth Circuit· 1934-12-12· cited 25×
- Home Powder Co. v. GeisEighth Circuit· 1913-03-22· cited 24×
- In re Dressler Producing Corp.Second Circuit· 1919-12-10· cited 24×
- In re De Camp Glass Casket Co.Sixth Circuit· 1921-04-15· cited 18×
- Rudebeck v. SandersonNinth Circuit· 1915-11-08· cited 15×
- Snyder v. FennerThird Circuit· 1939-02-02· cited 14×
- In re Quartz Gold Mining Co.D. Oregon· 1907-11-18· cited 11×
- In re Duplex Radiator Co.S.D. New York· 1906-01-18· cited 9×
- Blumenthal v. StratThird Circuit· 1915-12-01· cited 9×
- In Re Syracuse Stutz Co.Second Circuit· 1932-02-08· cited 7×
- In re Lisk Mfg. Co.W.D. New York· 1908-07-16· cited 7×
- In re Campbell County Hardware Co.E.D. Tennessee· 1924-11-19· cited 4×
- In re Tidewater Coal ExchangeS.D. New York· 1921-07-26· cited 4×
- Wientge v. Marine Trust Co.Second Circuit· 1936-07-23· cited 3×
- In re L. Van Bokkelen, Inc.D. Maryland· 1934-06-28· cited 3×
- In re Thomas McNally Co.S.D. New York· 1913-05-26· cited 3×
- In re Russell Wheel & Foundry Co.E.D. Michigan· 1915-03-20· cited 3×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- West Co. v. LeaSupreme Court· 1899-05-22· cited 112×
- In re Marine Machine & Conveyor Co.S.D. New York· 1899-02-03· cited 20×
- In re Bates Mach. Co.D. Massachusetts· 1899-01-28· cited 15×
- In re Mutual Mercantile AgencyS.D. New York· 1901-10-22· cited 14×
- Munzinger v. United PressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1900-06-15· cited 13×
- In re Independent Thread Co.D. New Jersey· 1902-03-24· cited 4×
Other cases named In re C. Moench & Sons Co.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.