In re C Children
Citations
- 209 N.E.3d 819
- 2023 Ohio 588
Syllabus
CUSTODY – PARENTAL TERMINATION – COUNSEL – WAIVER. In a permanent custody case, the juvenile court erred in determining that legal custodian maternal grandmother waived her right to counsel, notwithstanding her firing of three attorneys, where the magistrate failed to communicate to her the dangers of proceeding without counsel. [But see DISSENT: The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in denying grandmother's day-of-trial request for a continuance under R.C. 2151.352 where the record shows that grandmother obtained and fired three, separate appointed attorneys and subsequently failed to appear at the next three hearings, including the final pretrial hearing, and grandmother arrived late to the permanent-custody trial, which was already in progress, and requested a continuance to obtain private counsel.]
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re C.S.Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-09-27· cited 170×
- In re R.K. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-01-04· cited 34×
- In re W.W.E.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-23· cited 21×
- In re M ChildrenOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-13· cited 11×
- State v. LeeOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-07· cited 3×
- In re M.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.