Skip to main content

In re B.V.

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 971

Syllabus

Permanent custody; continuance; R.C. 2151.414(A)(2); Juv.R. 4(A); discretion; R.C. 2151.414(B)(1); R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(d); best interest; R.C. 2151.414(D)(1); R.C. 2151.414(D)(2); R.C. 2151.414(E); clear and convincing; manifest weight. Affirmed the juvenile court's judgments granting permanent custody of two children to the agency and terminating mother's parental rights. The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in denying a request for a continuance of the permanent-custody trial. The juvenile court engaged in the proper analysis and made the requisite determinations under R.C. 2151.414(B)(1) and 2151.414(D) and (E), and its judgments were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: S. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.