In Re Burgess Battery Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the consuming public will likely view alternating, repeating stripes on batteries to be ornamentation and not an indicator of source
• despite some evidence that applicant used “look for” advertising, the consuming public will likely view repeating black-and-white - 35 - Opposition No. 91196923 and Cancellation No. 92053498 stripes on batteries to be ornamentation and not an indicator of source
• despite some evidence that applicant used “look for” advertising, the consuming public will likely view repeating black-and-white - 35 - Opposition No. 91196923 and Cancellation No. 92053498 stripes on batteries to be ornamentation and not an indicator of source

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).