In Re Bryant Kendrick v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the second prong of § 12.05(C) was met where the claimant had been \additionally impaired in the period since he performed past relevant work\
• holding that the second prong of § 12.05(C) was met where the claimant had been \additionally impaired in the period since he performed past relevant work\
• finding that meeting all requirements of a listing entitles claimant to benefits without further inquiry
• reversing ALJ’s denial of benefits for a claimant who met Listing 12.05C
• reversing ALJ’s denial of benefits for a claimant who met Listing 12.05C
• reversing ALJ's denial of benefits for a claimant who met Listing 12.05C

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).