In Re Bruzzese

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring a creditor claiming security to provide a description of each item sufficient to satisfy the requirements of specificity under Article 9 of the New York version of the Uniform Commercial Code
• “[A] sampling of the debtors’ schedules I and J in the 30 cases [examined] raised a prima facie concern whether the debtors could meet their repayment obligations under these [reaffirmation] agreements.”
• debtor was not told that satisfying the reaffirmed debt of $1,800 on the terms offered by Sears, if paid at the rate stated in the reaffirmation, would take 76 months and cost her almost $1,500 in interest
• finding effective annual percentage rate of 93.84% for reaffirmed debt
• noting this argument by Sears

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).