In re Brown
Citations
- 80 Cal. 381
- 22 P. 233
- 1889 Cal. LEXIS 923
Syllabus
<p>Estates oe Deceased Persons—Non-resident Executor. —A non-resident executor may through an attorney apply for and receive letters testamentary in this state, and is constructively present through the attorney by whom he applies, though actually out of the state when the application and order for the issuance of letters is made; but he must come into the state within a reasonable time, and personally submit himself to the jurisdiction of the court, and personally conduct the settlement of the estate.</p> <p>Id. — Absence erom: State — Construction oe Code. — Section 1354 of the Civil Code, in using the words “a person absent from the state,” in providing for letters testamentary to a co-executor, or letters of administration with the will annexed, if there is no other executor, which may be revoked upon the return of the absentee, is construed to mean a person both actually and constructively absent from the state, who has made np application for letters.</p>
Judges: Belcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McGilvary v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-03-23· cited 14×
- Hecht v. CareyWyoming Supreme Court· 1904-12-12· cited 14×
- Voorhis v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-11-19· cited 8×
- Adams v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court· 1964-08-31· cited 8×
- Estate of KingCalifornia Superior Court, San Francisco County· 1896-03-08
- Seasongood v. SeasongoodOhio Court of Appeals· 1915-11-08
- Wilson v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court· 1930-02-08
- Howard v. CritchlowUtah Supreme Court· 1945-05-23
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.