In re Broome

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] signed retainer agreement is not essential to create [an attorney-client] relationship.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In re Carter
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-10-10

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Carmick
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 75×
• Burns v. Clayton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1960-11-19· cited 73×
• Marshall v. Marshall
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-08-27· cited 32×
• In Re Shehane
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-01-13· cited 16×
• In Re Alcorn
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2002-03-21· cited 16×
• Matter of Kirven
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-12-10· cited 14×
• Matter of Celsor
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-04-13· cited 6×
• In the Matter of Blackmon
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-05-23· cited 5×
• In re Bruner
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-04-08· cited 2×
• In re Jones
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-03-26· cited 1×