In Re Brooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that debtors could extend plan beyond thirty-six months to retain motor home
• denying confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan that proposed to maintain a motor home for recreational purposes; “debtors in Chapter 13 must undergo some belt-tightening.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hammermeister v. Hammermeister (Hammermeister)
  S.D. Ohio· 2001-12-17· cited 7×
• In Re McGovern
  S.D. Florida· 2002-05-24· cited 3×
• In Re McNeely
  N.D. West Virginia· 2007-04-09· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Matter of Jones
  N.D. Indiana· 1990-09-26· cited 35×
• In Re Rogers
  E.D. Michigan· 1986-10-28· cited 28×
• In Re Reyes
  N.D. Illinois· 1989-07-25· cited 26×
• In Re Lindsey
  M.D. Florida· 1991-01-03· cited 26×
• In Re Hedges
  E.D. Virginia· 1986-11-18· cited 25×
• In Re Zaleski
  D. North Dakota· 1997-12-05· cited 17×
• In Re Cordes
  D. Minnesota· 1992-11-18· cited 16×
• In Re Walsh
  M.D. Georgia· 1998-05-22· cited 8×
• In Re Gibson
  E.D. Missouri· 1992-06-18· cited 7×
• In Re Kasun
  E.D. Virginia· 1995-03-29· cited 7×
• In Re Webster
  E.D. Virginia· 1994-03-10· cited 6×
• In Re Rybicki
  S.D. Illinois· 1992-03-12· cited 5×