Skip to main content
· 12/27/2023

In Re Brittanye Morris v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]ppellant’s position” as mental patient in custody without counsel at psychiatric treatment facility “was even more conducive to compulsion than Miranda’s”
  • 18 U.S.C. § 3501(c) does not nullify rule under Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449, 77 S.Ct. 1356, 1 L.Ed.2d 1479 (1957), but only restricts its application in certain circumstances
  • 18 U.S.C. § 3501(c) does not nullify rule under Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449, 77 S.Ct. 1356, 1 L.Ed.2d 1479 (1957), but only restricts its application in certain circumstances
  • coercion in grand jury interrogation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.