Skip to main content

In re Briley-Holmes

Citations

  • 815 S.E.2d 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an attorney violated Rule 1.3 by failing to follow through with a case for her client
  • noting that “[r]emoval from practice for mental incapacity [under Rule 4-104] . . . is not the same thing as a disciplinary sanction imposed for misconduct”
  • noting that “[r]emoval from practice for mental incapacity [under Rule 4-104] . . . is not the same thing as a disciplinary sanction imposed for misconduct”
  • on special master’s report and recommendation, concluding that disbarment was appropriate for attorney who abandoned seven clients and violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 1.16
  • on special master’s report and recommendation, concluding that disbarment was appropriate for attorney who abandoned seven clients and violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 1.16
  • attorney’s failure to make payment toward arbitration awards was aggravating factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In re Briley-Holmes

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.