in Re BridgeTex Pipeline Company, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that decision overruling prior law filed after expiration of the three-year limitation period in section 822.3 expires provides an exception to the limitation period
• holding the applicant could not have argued a ruling should apply retroactively until the ruling was entered
• holding the applicant could not have argued a ruling should apply retroactively until the ruling was entered
• implying that a PCR filed outside the statute of limitations but within three years of a new ground of law was filed within a reasonable amount of time
• implying that a PCR filed outside the statute of limitations but within three years of a new ground of law was filed within a reasonable amount of time
• stating that the exception to section 822.3’s limitations period “must envision a category of legal claims that were viewed as fruitless at the time but became meritorious later on”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).