Connecticut Appellate Court· 12/26/2006
In Re Brianna C.
Citations
- 912 A.2d 505
- 98 Conn. App. 797
- 2006 Conn. App. LEXIS 539
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to review general assertions of family integrity and liberty interests as protected by due process clause of constitution as distinct constitutional claim on appeal
- predictive neglect doctrine applied where father suffered from mental health issues and respondent mother was unable to protect child from him
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flynn, Dipentima, Dupont
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re TKConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-01-29· cited 30×
- In re T.K.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-01-29· cited 27×
- In Re Shanaira C.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-02-12· cited 7×
- In re Zakai F.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2018-10-30· cited 3×
- In re Ja-lyn R.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-11-29· cited 3×
- In re Elijah C.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2016-04-12
- In re Hunter T.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2026-05-12
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- In re Juvenile Appeal (83-CD)Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-02-15· cited 307×
- In re Juvenile Appeal (84-AB)Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-02-21· cited 133×
- In re Jermaine S.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-01-11· cited 38×
- In re David L.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-07-13· cited 26×
- In re Haley B.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-01-13· cited 16×
- In re Kaurice B.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-06-29· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.