In Re Breckenridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Debtors’ plan was not proposed in good faith because, among other things, they had devoted a “significant portion of [their] income to the payment of an entirely discretionary expenditure, a church tithe_”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Navarro
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-03-17· cited 55×
• In Re Packham
  D. Utah· 1991-04-26· cited 22×
• In Re Green
  W.D. Michigan· 1987-05-21· cited 13×
• In Re Farmer
  D. Rhode Island· 1995-09-25· cited 5×
• In Re Walker
  E.D. Virginia· 1982-05-12· cited 5×
• Waguespack v. Rodriguez
  W.D. Louisiana· 1998-01-27· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Matter of Cook
  S.D. West Virginia· 1980-04-03· cited 26×
• In Re DeSimone
  S.D. New York· 1980-08-28· cited 20×
• Benkelman Cooperative Equity Exchange v. Koerperich (In Re Koerperich)
  D. Nebraska· 1980-09-08· cited 17×

Other cases named In Re Breckenridge

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• In Re Breckenridge
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-08-25· cited 1×
• In Re Breckenridge
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-07-14
• In Re Breckenridge
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-08-18
• In re Breckenridge
  N.D. Ohio· 1980-02-29