In re Brecher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting district court has concurrent jurisdiction over all civil proceedings arising under title 11 or arising in or related to cases under title 11
• noting district court has concurrent jurisdiction over all civil proceedings arising under title 11 or arising in or related to cases under title 11
• plaintiffs postpetition state law claims asserted against the bankruptcy trustee for conduct inextricably intertwined with the trustee’s sale of property of the bankruptcy estate involved a core proceeding
• post-petition state-law claim against a bankruptcy trustee arising out of the sale of estate property was a core proceeding
• “claims that arise under or in Title 11 are deemed to be ‘core’ proceedings, while claims that are related to Title 11 are ‘noncore’ proceedings”
• “In noncore 13 matters, the bankruptcy court acts as an adjunct to the district court, in a fashion similar 14 to that of a magistrate or special master.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).