In Re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation. Appeals of Robert A. Huggins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[a] state [antitrust act] cannot regulate sales that take place wholly outside it.\
• stating that defendant’s clerical or ministerial costs of compliance cannot be used to meet the statutory minimum because “then every case, however trivial, against a large company would cross the threshold”
• stating that court could rely on “the present value of the [anticipated] future cost savings” to plaintiffs that would result if the court enjoined the defendants’ alleged price-fixing
• applying Alabama antitrust law in indirect purchaser action by Alabama pharmacies against out-of-state drug manufacturers
• applying Alabama antitrust law in indirect purchaser action by Alabama pharmacies against out- of-state drug manufacturers
• noting the otherwise applicable rule that aggregation is not permitted and, therefore, at least one plaintiff in a particular class must satisfy the jurisdictional minimum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).