In re B.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying an ineffective assistance claim when the respondent “failed to specify what motions should have been made and what evidence could have been, but was not, presented before the trial court”
• this Court is bound by findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in permanency planning review orders where respondent had the -6- ability to appeal from those orders, but did not avail herself of that opportunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re D.J.D.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-07-05· cited 89×
• In re C.J.B.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-06-21· cited 45×
• In re A.L.G.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-10-04· cited 30×
• In re A.R.H.B.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2007-10-02· cited 29×
• In re C.E.L.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-07-19· cited 3×
• In Re LC
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2007-01-02
• In Re CEL
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-07-19
• In Re DJD
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-07-05
• In the Matter of Ib
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2009-09-01
• In Re ALG
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-10-04
• In Re BP
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-04-19
• In Re CJB
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-06-21
• In Re ARHB
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2007-10-02
• In re: K.N.H.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-06-15

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• In Re JLK
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2004-10-06· cited 54×