· 8/27/2007
In Re Boston Scientific Corp. ERISA Litigation
Citations
- 506 F. Supp. 2d 73
- 42 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1442
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62926
- 2007 WL 2412164
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that Plaintiffs have no claim for equitable relief in this case
- noting that while the ERISA action and securities case have commonalities, “the Court has reviewed no compelling authority that convinces it to require Plaintiffs, in this case, to meet the pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b)”
- “appropriate pleading standard for alleging breaches of fiduciary duty in ... [an] ERISA case is the notice pleading requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tauro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.