In Re Borders Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• courts have discretion with respect to what form of protection to grant under § 107
• “The [properly] redacted information primarily relates to the identities of key employees and vendors . . . .”
• “In order for a document to be sealed, it must contain information implicating the movant’s business operations.” (citing In re Orion Pictures Corp., 21 F.3d at 27)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Togut v. Deutsche Bank AG (In re Anthracite Capital, Inc.)
  S.D. New York· 2013-05-09· cited 17×
• In re Motions Seeking Access to 2019 Statements
  D. Delaware· 2018-03-27· cited 10×
• Gowan v. Westford Asset Management LLC (In re Dreier LLP)
  S.D. New York· 2013-01-29· cited 8×
• Motors Liquidation Co. Avoidance Action Trust ex rel. Wilmington Trust Co. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In re Motors Liquidation Co.)
  S.D. New York· 2016-12-09· cited 6×
• In re John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC
  D. Kansas· 2019-03-08· cited 2×
• In re Rivera
  D. Puerto Rico· 2015-01-30· cited 1×