S.D. California· 2/27/2018
In re Border Infrastructure Envtl. Litig.
Citations
- 284 F. Supp. 3d 1092
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the court \cannot and does not consider whether underlying decisions to construct the border barriers are politically wise or prudent\
- noting that the court \cannot and does not consider whether underlying decisions to construct the border barriers are politically wise or prudent\
- rejecting ultra vires argument that Secretary exceeded \delegated powers by approving the waivers or executing construction contracts prior to completing the consultation process\ because IIRIRA lacks \a 'clear and mandatory' mandate regarding the timing of consultation\
- rejecting ultra vires argument that Secretary exceeded “delegated powers by approving the waivers or executing construction contracts prior to completing the consultation process” because HRIRA lacks “a ‘clear and mandatory’ mandate regarding the timing of consultation”
- “[A] Take Care challenge in this case would essentially open the doors to an undisciplined and unguided review process for all decisions made by the Executive Department.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Curiel, Hon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brackeen v. HaalandFifth Circuit· 2021-04-06· cited 36×
- Casa De Md. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.D. Maryland· 2018-03-05· cited 23×
- Sierra Club v. TrumpN.D. California· 2019-05-24· cited 9×
- California v. TrumpN.D. California· 2019-05-24· cited 2×
- North American Butterfly Association v. NielsenDistrict of Columbia· 2019-02-14
Cites
84 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 6,373×
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-01-18· cited 2,457×
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1944-03-27· cited 1,935×
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 1,926×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,818×
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court· 1952-06-02· cited 1,646×
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court· 2001-02-27· cited 1,439×
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-05-27· cited 1,364×
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court· 2009-04-28· cited 1,340×
- Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court· 2007-04-02· cited 1,227×
- Davis v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 1,183×
- Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 1,166×
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court· 1935-01-07· cited 1,089×
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court· 1988-04-20· cited 1,067×
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 1,043×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.