In Re Bolden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The defendant, who did not fit definition of a \child\ at time of his offense, was not entitled to treatment as a juvenile, even though he fit definition of a \child\ at time of his trial.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bracewell v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1979-05-25· cited 33×
• Watters v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1978-05-30· cited 27×
• Ex Parte Ward
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1988-12-09· cited 23×
• Stewart v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2008-02-01· cited 11×
• Robert Earl Walton, Cross-Appellant v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama J.D. White, Cross-Appellees
  Eleventh Circuit· 1993-03-23· cited 5×
• Hobbie v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-05-11· cited 5×
• Royal v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-07-12
• Ex parte Bolden
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1978-03-22
• Cleckler v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-11-10

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1977-12-22· cited 61×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1953-06-30· cited 33×
• Mayton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1974-06-04· cited 7×