Skip to main content
W.D. Wisconsin· 4/7/2015

In re Bogan

Citations

  • 534 B.R. 346
  • 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 1164
  • 2015 WL 1598056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting Woolner’s argument that the rules can provide an independent basis for disallowing an exemption
  • “[T]he Code defines the creation, alteration or elimination of substantive rights[;] the Bankruptcy Rules only define the process by which these privileges may be effected.” (quoting In re Hanover Indus. Mach. Co., 61 B.R. 551, 552 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.