Customs and Patent Appeals· 12/5/1974
In re Boe
Citations
- 505 F.2d 1297
- 184 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 38
- 1974 CCPA LEXIS 107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing “[t]he main motivation for combining” two prior art references
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re KuehlCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1973-03-22· cited 28×
- In re WadlingerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1974-05-23· cited 19×
- Application of Floyd E. NaylorCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1967-02-09· cited 14×
- Application of Jerome J. KanterCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1968-07-03· cited 14×
- Application of Wilhelm Neugebauer, Martha Tomanek and Hans BehmenburgCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1964-04-09· cited 13×
- In re SchneiderCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1973-08-09· cited 10×
- In re SaetherCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1974-02-28· cited 8×
- Application of David J. Pye and Donald K. PetersonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1966-02-10· cited 6×
- Application of Everett C. HunterCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1961-02-06· cited 1×
- In re GlassCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1973-02-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.