In Re Boca Village Ass'n, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing that the only purpose served in a corporate chapter 7 case is the fair and orderly liquidation of corporate assets to creditors
• discussing Perlin and concluding that “Debtor’s negative implication argument that Congress elected not to add a good faith requirement under § 707(a) when it modified § 707(b) is similarly unpersuasive to this Court.”
• discussing Perlin and concluding that “Debtor’s negative implication argument that Congress elected not to add a good faith requirement under § 707(a) when it modified § 707(b) is similarly unpersuasive to this Court.”
• “[Section]707(a) should be limited to extreme misconduct falling outside the purview of more specific Code provisions, such as using bankruptcy as a ‘scorched earth’ tactic against a diligent creditor, or using bankruptcy as a refuge from another court's jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).