In Re Bobo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dicta; noting that commitment proceedings generally rely on medical experts whose opinions are based on \reasonable medical certainty\ and not absolute certainty
• distinguishing between reasonable medical certainty and absolute certainty
• distinguishing between reasonable medical certainty and absolute certainty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re MH 2007-001236
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-08-26· cited 32×
• Matter of Pirkl
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-05-30· cited 11×
• In Re the Welfare of Hofmaster
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-01-17· cited 11×
• State v. Johnson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1988-04-19· cited 4×
• Matter of Beard
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-07-29· cited 3×
• In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-08-26· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Addington v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 3,004×
• State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond Struzyk
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-26· cited 44×
• Minnesota State Bar Ass'n v. Divorce Assistance Ass'n
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-12-17· cited 43×
• In Re Baker
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-07-12· cited 9×
• In Re Verhelst
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-07-03· cited 3×