In Re Board of Certified Court Reporter Examiners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exhaustion of state administrative remedies is not a prerequisite to section 1983 action
• holding that § 1983 plaintiffs need not exhaust state remedies
• avoiding, on prudential grounds, the decision whether Board of Regents is arm of the state for Eleventh Amendment purposes
• avoiding, on prudential grounds, the decision whether Board of Regents is arm of the state for Eleventh Amendment purposes
• “exhaustion of state administrative remedies is not a prerequisite to an action under § 1983”
• “[I]n deciding whether we should . . . require exhaustion of state administrative remedies, we look to congressional intent . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).