· 12/22/2000
In Re Bluewater Network
Citations
- 234 F.3d 1305
- 344 U.S. App. D.C. 175
- 2001 A.M.C. 1709
- 31 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20359
- 51 ERC (BNA) 1801
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 33572
- 2000 WL 1836048
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that plaintiff’s mandamus claim challenging agency’s failure to comply with statute mandating certain action was timely
- issuing a writ of mandamus to compel the Coast Guard after more than ten years of non-compliance to promulgate congressionally mandated regulations
- “[I]ssuance of the writ is an extraordinary remedy, reserved only for the most transparent violations of a clear duty to act.”
- mandamus is “reserved 17 only for the most transparent violations of a clear duty to act”
- “[I]ssuance of the writ [of mandamus] is an extraordinary remedy, reserved only for the most transparent violations of a clear duty to act.”
- mandamus is “reserved only for the most transparent violations of a clear duty to act”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, Sentelle, Henderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.