In re Blake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no due process violation where a request for a continuance could have cured any prejudice
• petitioner not prejudiced where a continuance would have cured any lack of notice
• no due process violation where a continuance would have cured any prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McIntire v. Woodall
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-09-22· cited 21×
• In re Gilpatric
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-03-25· cited 14×
• Appeal of Brown
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-11-04· cited 13×
• In re Croteau
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-05-26· cited 8×
• Appeal of Commercial Union Insurance
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-11-09· cited 7×
• Appeal of Chickering
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-04-29· cited 5×
• Appeal of McKerley Health Facilities
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2000-08-15· cited 3×
• In re Herron
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-07-29· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Appeal of Concord Natural Gas Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-08-05· cited 34×
• In re Markievitz
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-04-16· cited 15×
• Appeal of Lambrou
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-07-15· cited 15×
• Attitash Mountain Service Co. v. Schuck
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-04-02· cited 12×
• Rowe v. City of Portsmouth
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-02-19· cited 5×
• In re Gunzel
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-02-16· cited 4×
• Xydias v. Davidson Rubber Co.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1989-06-28· cited 4×