Skip to main content
· 1/13/2020

In re Blaher

Citations

  • 140 S. Ct. 862
  • 205 L. Ed. 2d 518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that \[m]aterial differences\ include - 39 - \dissimilar criminal involvement\ between the defendant and the comparator (quoting United States v. Candelario-Ramos, 45 F.4th 521, 526 (1st Cir. 2022))
  • rejecting sentencing disparity claim in part because co-defendants were charged with different federal gun-related offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.