In Re Black

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “while Congress’ intention to prohibit lengthy plans is evidenced in its legislative history, case precedent and the Code, § 1322(c
• finding that “while Congress’ intention to prohibit lengthy plans is evidenced in its legislative history, case precedent and the Code, § 1322(c
• permitting debtor to complete plan as it was substantially completed by end of 60 month period
• § 1322 has no provision for dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Paul Klaas v.
  Third Circuit· 2017-06-01· cited 33×
• Profit v. Savage (In Re Profit)
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-09-17· cited 24×
• In Re Cutillo
  N.D. New York· 1995-04-07· cited 18×
• In Re Jacobs
  N.D. New York· 2001-05-16· cited 18×
• Marshall v. Henry (In Re Henry)
  N.D. Illinois· 2007-02-13· cited 12×
• Citizens Trust & Savings Bank v. Schafer (In Re Schafer)
  W.D. Michigan· 1989-01-06· cited 9×
• Shovlin v. Klaas
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-08-28· cited 8×
• In Re Henry
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-06-12· cited 5×
• Shovlin v. Klaas
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-07-29· cited 5×
• Winnecour v. Klaas (In re Klaas)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-06-04· cited 3×
• Shovlin v. Klaas (In re Klaas)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-03-01· cited 2×
• In Re Roberts
  D. Rhode Island· 2000-04-14· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Greer
  C.D. California· 1986-05-19· cited 45×
• In Re Festa
  S.D. Ohio· 1986-08-12· cited 12×