In re B.J.J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that government did not breach a settlement agreement between the Forest Service and Copar by filing an administrative complaint with the Bureau of Land Management contesting the validity of the El Cajete mining claims
• explaining that the BLM has authority to “file an administrative contest proceeding if the [GJovernment finds that the mining claim does not in fact contain a discovery of a valuable mineral deposit”
• “Until a patent issues, the government retains rights and interest in the federal lands and has the authority to regulate them.”
• construing Section 3809.100 as requiring a “common variety determination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).