Skip to main content
· 8/1/2000

In Re: Birmingham-Nashville Express, Inc., Debtor. Travelers Property Casualty Corporation v. Birmingham-Nashville Express, Inc.

Citations

  • 224 F.3d 511
  • 44 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 935
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18303
  • 36 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 139
  • 2000 WL 1051784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that \employer's statutorily mandated payment to an employee benefit plan ... is no less of a `contribution' to such a fund simply because it is mandated by statute\
  • observing that “employer’s statutorily mandated payment to an employee benefit plan ... is no less of a ‘contribution’ to such a fund simply because it is mandated by statute”
  • observing that \employer’s statutorily mandated payment to an employee benefit plan . . . is no less of a ‘contribution’ to such a fund simply because it is mandated by stat- ute\
  • holding unpaid workers' compensation premiums are not entitled to priority status
  • holding unpaid workers’ compensation premiums are not entitled to priority status
  • “An employer’s statutorily mandated payment to an employee benefit fund, for example, is no less of a ‘contribution’ to such a fund simply because it is mandated by statute, agency regulations, an employee contract, or a collective bargaining agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, Moore, Farris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.