Skip to main content
· 12/15/2010

In Re Bigler, LP

Citations

  • 443 B.R. 101
  • 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 4635
  • 54 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 20
  • 2010 WL 5173846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • arguing that the absence of a stalking horse procedure made the upset of an auction more improper, because in a stalking horse proceeding, bidder would have known it could be outbid at the sale hearing and it could have protected itself with a breakup fee
  • declining the reopen bidding where the movant participated in the first auction but waited until the successful bidder had already expended substantial time and efforts towards purchasing the assets to submit a higher upset bid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jeff Bohm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.