In re Bhagat Singh Thind

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in order for expert scientific testimony to be admissible, it must be \generally accepted\ as reliable in the relevant scientific community
• holding that in order for expert scientific testimony to be admissible, it must be “generally accepted” as reliable in the relevant scientific community
• concluding that evidence did not establish testimony of Dr. Kassin on general police environment and susceptibility to false confessions was scientifically reliable
• holding that veterinarian's opinion as to cause of death of horses was not scientific evidence subject to the admissibility requirement of Frye
• holding that expert testimony must be based on scientific methods that are sufficiently established and accepted
• holding that expert opinions are admissible if the question involved does not lie in the range of common experience or common knowledge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).